Step 5 – Trial Balance

Doing the trial balance reminded me of doing the account statements back in term 3 2019. It was a fun experience, putting all the newly developed knowledge to use and tinkering with numbers to see if they balance like they should. To be honest with you, I think I spent more time on this section than I should’ve and I’m going to blame tired eyes for not seeing what was in front of me.

Honestly, after doing this exercise its clear to see that trial balances aren’t overly complicated. The most complicated part of a trial balance is understanding your company’s reports. When entering the figures from the balance sheet into the trial balance, the format was very basic. Negatives were inside brackets, positives were normal. I tricked myself up at the start by putting positives in the credit column and negatives in the debit column until I was about to move onto the income statement and the lightbulb flicked on. An increase in an asset is a debit meaning the assets need to be placed in the debit column unless of course they are a negative. Who knew that writing down Asset = Debit a few times would flood back randomly when looking at numbers?

When it came time to close off the trial balance, I was looking at the ‘Total comprehensive income/(expense) recognised for the year ended 30 June 2019’ and trying to figure out where those figures came from. I spent a solid 1-2 hours tinkering with equations to try and match the figures to a total on my spreadsheet but no dice. After about 5 coffees, a bit of sleep and a clear mind, I saw that right above the section I was looking at lied the profit/loss, actuarial loss on pension scheme and tax on items above taken directly to equity. Low and behold, here are the figures I have desperately been searching for! I go back to the explanation video Maria Tyler has done to make sure I’m not going crazy, I follow the steps and there it is! A perfectly balanced sheet. Sheer joy is what I feel and what a feeling it is!

Although the trial balance zeros at the end, I was second guessing myself for 1 tiny bit. Under the revenue section of my income statement, Finance income totals 7.1 which is exactly the total made up in the issue of shares (0.4 in share capital and 6.7 in share premium) row under the total comprehensive income SOCIE section. To squash this doubt in my mind, I read the notes regarding finance income and turns out that it’s just income relating to employee benefits, interest receivable and short-term bank deposits. After reading this, I know its safe to keep the calculations exactly how they are rather than splitting the finance income across share capital and share premium as depicted in the total comprehensive income SOCIE section.

Step 4 – Income Statement

See, bank statements are one thing I never check. I read Barefoot Investors and my partner and I started following it religiously last year but then got a bit lazy and looking through just March’s statement was a real eye opener. If I was a company in normal circumstances, for the month of march I would be thoroughly disappointed as my statements show a big loss (just on income vs expense). Thankfully, I am just an ordinary person who has plenty of savings and very thankful that my partner and I are still employed during this period.

The exercise overall was a fun task to flick through accounts and see how my learning categorises the payments I see. It did take me a few tries to categorise payments correctly as I tried to be as realistic and thoughtful as possible. If I wanted to make excuses for myself, I could’ve said work is consuming all of my time and chosen the easy way out by doing blanket categorisations however I wanted to challenge myself and depict a realistic chart of accounts with a semi in-depth breakdown.

For the purpose of this step, I used my ‘Daily Expense’ account where I have my bills direct debited from and pays deposited into. I like many others in todays day and age have multiple accounts (as you could see from my internal transfer debits) but only chose to select my main account to do my reflection on. To save myself time, I only did my chart of accounts based on 1 of 4 accounts and over a 1-month period. March may have been a bad month to pick as it is not an accurate reflection of my usual monthly spending however just like businesses we have been given to study this term, my bank account is feeling the effects of COVID-19.

Doing this exercise really made me think about mine and my partners spending. It also made me think about how things are technically classified, for example my bike loan to me is just a bill, however it is a liability to me as if I stop paying it I can have my bike repossessed and my credit score would be affected.

I did have difficulty with some categorisations such as my pets. I had the thought of categorising them as a liability for the sole reason that if they get out and cause havoc, I am legally responsible for them therefore they are a liability. After listening to Maria talk about what a liability would be considered (rego, insurance, etc), I decided that my pets would be classified as an expense. I periodically spend money on food, vets, treats etc however there is no obligation I expect from them and no gain I get other than a loving friend.

The chart of accounts that I created for the month of march shows a fairly accurate representation of the general transactions that my partner and I make on a monthly basis. There are a few irregularities (like any company) such as refunds and expenses related to a holiday, we weren’t able to take due to COVID-19. Similar to the chart of accounts given in the example, it depicts income and expenses for a couple, but the depth of the accounts is very minimal. For me to get a better understanding of my accounts, I decided to try and accurately categorise the transactions for a deeper picture of the overall expenses we incur. It was crazy to see that for the month of march, our expenses outweighed our income by a good 33% however that is considered normal in the world of business as some months attract good profit and other months attract losses.  

The level of detail in which we do our chart of accounts has been left to us however to get a deeper understanding of how a business is running, they need to be categorised deeper to allow someone looking at the accounts to see where spending can be increased or decreased. In the example given, the general living expenses blankets nearly everything therefore it is hard to see where exactly the money is being spent. If you were to expand on the living expenses account, you would then be in a position to rethink your spending and see where you can make some savings. When I went through and categorised my account statement, I tried to split all transactions up to a realistic level of grouping without individualising every single expense.

Just after the bushfires happened and everyone was applying for the Disaster Recovery Allowance, businesses and sole traders needed to provide a profit and loss statement as well as a tax return which included the depreciation schedule. I saw many varying types of profit and loss statements with varying degrees of categorisations which made it harder for me to assess the claim of lost income. There were some statements where expenses were generalised (like the example given in the assignment) which then made the claim process take even longer as I would then have to call the customer and get a breakdown to see what is assessed and what is not assessed as an expense. On the other hand, I would see statements where every expense was categorised into a relevant account making it easy to track what was a genuine business expense and what was a personal expense from the business account.

Doing this activity has just cemented my understanding of the benefits attributed to an in-depth income statement and why double-entry bookkeeping is important. For anyone to be able to make improvements to a businesses profitability (even personal profitability), you must first be able to identify where the income and expenses are coming from. One thing I have found, is every time I do an activity like this, I find something that I can take away and use in my personal life. After looking at the income statement for march, my partner and I sat down and had a chat regarding our spending and what we can do to improve our financial position. Personally, I think that if I was to do a basic income statement monthly or quarterly, I would be able to gain some insight as to what my major expenses are and help identify areas where my partner and I can save some money.

I believe that a few ledger accounts outlined in the chart of accounts would better represent the actual financial position of someone if they were recorded as an accrual basis of accounting rather than a cash basis. Take for example the $470 paid for electricity. On a cash basis, the money left my account on a specific day in March however that does not mean that my partner and I used $470 worth of electricity on that specific day. The $470 represents the electricity used from December till March and if it was reflected in a liability accrued ledger, you would then be able to evenly apportion the amount over the period it represents rather than when it was paid. The reason this would be beneficial is due to the accuracy of transaction accountability in the sense that March is showing a massive expense however it was accrued over a 3-month period.   Insurance is another expense that would be better suited to an accrual basis rather than a cash basis as the lump sum payment is for a future benefit. In the bank statement, there are 2 charges for insurance which is paid on a monthly basis. The charge shown on the bank statement is called a prepaid expense where the funds are paid now for a future benefit. With the scheme of insurance, I opt to pay monthly so the money that’s paid now gives me 1 months comprehensive cover on my motorbike. Personally I believe this is an accurate representation on my monthly income statement as each month I outlay a cost to receive the benefit for the whole month however if I was to pay yearly, the charge for March would be the total of a years coverage and would majorly affect the representation of my financial position. Having an asset prepaid expense ledger would prove to be beneficial for an accurate representation of the account statement as although the insurance premium may be $1100 for a year, only $92 ($1100/12 months) would be attributed to the month of march.

Barratt Developments

Well it went from cars to construction. To be 100% honest, housing doesn’t interest me that much, and as a result I am struggling to find motivation to read copious amounts of information about this company. I don’t know if it’s because I don’t own my own home yet so don’t have a significant attachment to the housing sector or the fact that in ACCT11059, I was given a company that actually interested me, so I was thoroughly engaged. Either way, I have an assignment to do so here I am.

Barratt Developments Scotland Receives Maximum Rating from ...

My company is Barratt Developments PLC who as you may have already connected the dots, develop houses. They are a company based in the UK and seem to be doing reasonably well for themselves based on a quick glance at their annual report.

Starting with the history, Barratt Developments was founded in 1953 when Sir Lawrie Barratt, an accountant couldn’t afford to buy a house so instead decided to build one for £1,750. 15 years later, the company made its way onto the London Stock Exchange and by the end of the 80’s, have sold over 100,000 new homes across the UK. In the 90’s, a venture (Oakleaf Homes) from 1971 re-emerges and older homes are sold at a competitive prices and benefits usually only available on new homes. By 95, Barratt opens a show village in Northampton and the milestone of 200,000 homes sold is reached. 2013 marks the year where Barratt scoops up 102 Quality Awards for outstanding workmanship in the annual NHBC Pride in the Job competition (highest amount ever won by a single company). 2014 marks 400,000 completed homes and as a result, they plant 400,000 trees and shrubs over the following 18 months. Fast forward to 2019, the Barratt Group again achieved the maximum five-star rating in the annual Home Builders Federation customer satisfaction survey. This was the tenth year running that Barratt has won the top rating – the only major national housebuilder to do so.

Moving on to the reports, there’s a lot of information in the annual reports which is very new to me such as ‘waste intensity’ where Barratt measures the amount of waste per tonne per 100 m2 generated from above ground construction. I guess it’s one of those things that you don’t think about if you aren’t in the business but would be an essential measurement tool to track expenses and ensure efficiency across the projects. One thing I did find interesting though was ‘Land Bank’ as it’s a real eye opener. My preconceived notion of property development companies is they see a block of land, buy it, flip it and make a buck or two. Turns out, land bank is the collection of land the company has acquired. Surprisingly, in the 2019 financial year, Barratt Developments PLC had 18,448 plots approved for purchase which equates to 4.7 years worth of land for future development. That surprises me because it requires the business to literally gamble with land by acquiring it at the lowest price and wait for it to develop into a prime location, to then on sell for a profit.

Personally, I think this company will build on me (no pun intended) but will require a bit of time for me to dissect all the finer details. Now that’s going to require time and time is something that I currently don’t have due to our good friend COVID-19.

Obviously, there’s 2 major concerns that I am thinking about when reading through the annual reports. How will Brexit and Coronavirus effect this company? Like any company when there is a massive change announced or a worldwide pandemic, shares will fall, deals fold and revenue is lost.

So brief history here, 22 Feb 2016 saw the referendum date of 23 June 2016 announced regarding Brexit. Vote passed 52% – 48% meaning UK is leaving the EU. Pros and cons to this, but for Barratt, they faced the reality of a can of worms being opened up. You see, a free movement of labour within the EU (having 28 countries pre-Brexit) meant wages can be competitive and sourcing of material can be cheap due to the competitive market. All positive things for a company that tries to maximise profits and keep costs down. As outlined in this article, Barratt now face the obstacle of labour shortage if the UK is to leave the EU. CEO of Barratt, David Thomas estimates that 30-40% of its workforce are from Mainland EU and if the UK were to leave the EU, it would lead to less foreign investment (up to 60%) and drive up labour and material costs (55% and 53% respectively). That’s a huge jump in the terms of outgoing expenses.

Surprisingly though, Barratt have defied the odds of crumbling and posted profits of £910m pre-tax in the 2018-2019 financial year which was an 8.9% increase over the previous financial year. Operating margins rose by 1.2% from 17.7%, home completions rose 2.6% to 17,856, dividend per share up 5.9% from 43.8p to 46.4p however revenue did drop 2.3% from £4.87b to £4.76b so overall not such a bad year.

Now with Coronavirus, I don’t have much information to share with you as it is something the world has never experienced before but since it has come around, Barratt’s share prices have taken a massive tumble, 47% to be exact in a 1-month period (21/02/2020 – 20/03/2020). Clearly this is a devastating blow to a company that was tracking so well but it will be interesting to see how they bounce back from it.

Anyways, that’s enough for now I believe. Will be interesting to see where this term takes me in regard to learning about this company but for now I think this is as much property development I can handle. If you want to read up more about the company, look here.